<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>anglais-facile.com par jonathan lewis &#187; had</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anglais-facile.com/tag/had/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anglais-facile.com</link>
	<description>l&#039;anglais pour francophones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 07:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>have/has/had in use</title>
		<link>http://anglais-facile.com/vocabulaire/havehashad-in-use/</link>
		<comments>http://anglais-facile.com/vocabulaire/havehashad-in-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>profanglais</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vocabulaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[had]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[has]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irregular verbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anglais-facile.com/?p=1619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This video will show you how to use the verb &#8216;to have&#8217;. As you know, it is a very simple irregular verb, with only four forms: have and has in the present, has in the past, and having as the present participle. Some of you will already know that some English speakers use &#8216;have/has got&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anglais-facile.com/vocabulaire/havehashad-in-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>auxiliary: would or had?</title>
		<link>http://anglais-facile.com/grammaire/auxiliary-would-or-had/</link>
		<comments>http://anglais-facile.com/grammaire/auxiliary-would-or-had/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>profanglais</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grammaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apostrophe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auxiliaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[had]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[would]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anglais-facile.com/?p=1576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On entend souvent un &#8216;d&#8217; après le sujet d&#8217;une phrase: she&#8217;d been to Paris He&#8217;d do it for you Mais de quoi s&#8217;agit l&#8217;apostrophe suivi par la lettre &#8216;d&#8217; &#8211; c&#8217;est &#8216;would&#8217; ou &#8216;had&#8217;? Faites ce petit exercice afin de mieux comprendre: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anglais-facile.com/grammaire/auxiliary-would-or-had/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

